If the U.S. has a solution, it's a direct explanation for North Korea, 'Mr. Kim said. In my gut, the United States is still not ready to respond to the DPRK, and the United States's dialogue is only a trick to show the "to meet with the United States" to take time. If the United States does not withdraw its hostile policy to the DPRK's right to existence and the right to development, it is of the view that the issue would never be resolved by secondary issues such as the final declaration on paper-making or the establishment of a liaison office that could become waste paper at any time with the tide of the situation. 'I'm not interested in that kind of meeting,' he said at the end.
North Korea's ambassador to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that he strongly criticized the conduct of the United States and South Korea, saying that the "No one would believe that the changing military exercise would change the nature of its aggression." 's statement also pointed out that the joint tactical training of the two sides was continuing last year when the "to guard against the trump" and other joint exercises were cancelled last year by the United States and South Korea. The DPRK is of the view that it is an act of extreme provocation and danger to the close "And poured a basin of cold water." of the United States on the verge of a burst.
The United States has also delivered new signals to North Korea in November after talks with U.S. officials in October. South Korean lawmakers said it is expected that the consultations on the working level of the two countries will not be later than the beginning of December to coordinate the summit's content, according to the report of the South Korean Association on Nov.4. In addition to Bigan, the U. S. anti-long 13-day visit to South Korea also showed a willingness to narrow the scale of the military exercises. The U.S. defense secretary, Esperp, said on November 13 that the U.S. defense secretary, Esperp, left for the first time to attend the 51st meeting of the Korea-US security agreement. The U.S. side can adjust and narrow the joint force according to the diplomatic needs. The scale of the show. South Korea said it is possible for the DPRK to return to the consultations if the United States is to narrow the scale of the joint.
(picture source:搜狗图片)
A spokesman for the State Council of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) today issued a statement to the U.S. and South Korea that the joint air training, to be held in the near future, was a "counter-to-hostile exercise", saying that it was an important "total negative" to meet the consensus in Singapore. The statement said that the DPRK side has made it clear that the joint military exercises planned by the United States and South Korea are the main reasons for the inevitable intensification of the situation in the Korean peninsula and the region. The DPRK is deeply concerned about the military exercises and has issued a number of warnings to stop the conduct. However, despite repeated warnings by the DPRK, the United States and South Korea have decided to implement this counter-to-hostile military exercise in sensitive times, which will further trigger the people of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Anger, challenge the patient's patience. The talks also stressed that the DPRK, on the basis of the agreement, has suspended many of the U.S. 's concerns, and made every effort to take good faith measures, but the United States has insisted that the joint military exercises carried out by the DPRK and the South Korean people in the old way are the "To have a good deed of betrayal.".
On November 14, the Foreign Minister of the Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kim Ming-ji, issued a statement on the resumption of the talks with the United States. The U.S. Department of State's Special Representative for North Korea has sent a signal from a third country, hoping that the two sides will meet in December to restart the talks, Mr. Kim said. It is inexplicable that the representative of the DPRK's policy on the DPRK's policy on the Korean-American dialogue is not in direct contact with me, but through a third party's so-called DPRK-US relationship, it is an inexplicable fact that the DPRK has more and more questions. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is willing to restart the negotiations with the United States and, as long as it can resolve the problem through consultation, the DPRK will Where and where you can sit with the United States. North Korea has no interest in that kind of consultation, as the United States, like the Swedish work in the United States in early October, still pursues the impure purpose of paralysing North Korea in order to smooth over the end of the year. The United States should first respond to the North's request and give a solution to the issue that North Korea has clearly stated to the United States for matters and needs.
As the "end of year" of North Korea is approaching, the United States transfers its "willing to restart the negotiation signal" to the North through "third country". North Korea is willing to resume talks with the United States, but it is not interested in the lack of good faith in the reproduction of the "In the early October of this year, Sweden held consultations with the United States", the spokesman for the Korean Foreign Ministry said on Monday. North Korea has made a request and a priority solution to the U.S., and the United States should first respond to the North's request and give a solution, Mr. Jin said. The U.S. proposal for dialogue is, however, a trick to show the "to meet with the United States" 's time.
The process of restarting the talks in the United States has been in a standstill since the failure of the South-to-U.S. summit in February. Last month, Mr. Kim and Bigan met in Stockholm, the capital of Sweden, a first meeting between U.S. President Trump and the North Korean leader, Mr. Kim, in June's agreement to restart the talks. But after a few hours the meeting was announced to be over, and no new results were produced, Mr. Jin said in the talks, which said the United States proposed a "nauseating".
